Many hackers poison the cache of DNS servers by bombarding them with false records. Windows Server and even Server aren't compatible with the Windows R2 implementation. At its most basic level, DNSSEC assures the integrity of the DNS infrastructure through technologies that verify the authenticity of received data, including authenticated denial-of-existence responses.
Assurance is enabled through public key cryptography, which enables the use of digital signatures on all DNS responses. A successful digital signature validation means that the data received is genuine and can be trusted. The digital signature is generated using the DNS zone's private key which is kept secret and the content of the record, and can be validated with the public key.
If a packet is generated from a malicious source, its digital signature will fail; if a packet has been modified, the signature will no longer match the content. The critical element is the trust. The client must trust the zone's public key because the public key is used to authenticate the response by decrypting the signature, which was created using the private key.
This means that clients would need only to trust the root zone, since the root zone is used to authenticate all the other child zones. In Figure 1's example,. Figure 1: Setting the trust anchor You see this today with normal public key infrastructure PKI certificates. These authorities then grant certificates to sites, and the certificates are signed by the root CAs.
Because clients trust the root CA, they trust certificates signed by a CA that has effectively been vouched for by the root authorities they trust.
DNS works the same way: Clients trust the root and top-level domains assuming the root and top-level domains are the trust anchors , which will then authenticate the child sites. Whenever we talk about digital signatures, we need a mechanism for clients to be able to validate the signature.
This is achieved through public key cryptography. A public key for the secured DNS zone is available for clients to use to validate the digital signature that was generated using the DNS zone's private key. If a client has a trust anchor to a zone, the client builds a chain of authentication to any child zone of the trust anchor, removing the need for DNS clients to explicitly trust every zone within a namespace.
The public keys for the security zones are actually stored within the DNS infrastructure, but how do you know who to trust? How do you get valid trust anchors since the root DNS zone can't sign? These public repositories are trust anchors on the clients. We trust these repositories to do the right thing and make sure the public keys they store are legitimate—the same way we trust Verisign to ensure that a company is genuine before giving them SSL or code signing certificates.
Figure 2: Trusting DNS responses Alternatively, you can manually configure trust anchors within DNS by specifying a zone name and specifying the public key that zone name servers give, as Figure 2 shows. When the entry point for a trust chain i. In the typical DNS-resolution flow, you ask your local DNS server and it recursively looks up the answer, so your DNS server is the component that needs to validate responses.
To provide maximum protection for end clients, best practice is to use IPsec to authenticate the data and perhaps encrypt communication between the client and the local DNS server. This method ensures no local corruption of data from the DNS server to the client. Figure 4 shows a sample policy.
A zone that is digitally signed with DNSSEC will no longer accept any dynamic updates, which most environments use for their hosts to register their host-to-IP mappings without any manual intervention. Then, you need to delete the existing zone, import the new signed zone file, and reset to be AD integrated. The keys we created have a limited lifetime and need to be updated; if we have trust anchors configured, those public keys will change and therefore require updating.
In environments that have a deep DNS namespace, it can sometimes be tricky to know the correct DNS suffix for an address. In the past, we would define a global suffix list of all the DNS suffixes that should be tried when resolving a name. Is there anything else that must be done to disable the caching?
I think your problem is that your load balancer is trying to send all traffic from the same host to the same server You need to explicitly tell your load balancer that you want to disable sticky sessions and enable "round robin" Based on this other question , I think you need.
You can set the ServicePointManager settings via the web. See the MSDN documentation. Also, there's another similar setting enableDnsRoundRobin which looks like it might help you too. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Asked 9 years, 7 months ago. Active 8 years, 6 months ago. Viewed 2k times. Is there something else I could look at which might be causing these problem?
Improve this question. Additionally, the dates and the times may change when you perform certain operations on the files. Important Windows 7 hotfixes and Windows Server R2 hotfixes are included in the same packages. However, hotfixes on the Hotfix Request page are listed under both operating systems. Always refer to the "Applies To" section in articles to determine the actual operating system that each hotfix applies to. The security catalog files, for which the attributes are not listed, are signed with a Microsoft digital signature.
To work around this issue, restart the DNS Server service. Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section. General information about the DNS Cache Locking feature For more information about software update terminology, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:. Need more help? Expand your skills.
Get new features first.
0コメント